NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 7600G

Place in the ranking	1134	924
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.11
Power efficiency	3.12	3.52
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Devastator	GK107
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 September 2012 (12 years ago)	23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	192
Core clock speed	320 MHz	797 MHz
Boost clock speed	424 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,303 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.18	12.75
Floating-point processing power	0.3256 TFLOPS	0.306 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16
TMUs	24	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	160 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	2 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	891 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	28.51 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	-	3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7600G 0.86

NVS 510 1.79
+108%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7600G 330

NVS 510 690
+109%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Fortnite	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
World of Tanks	21−24 −90.5%	40−45 +90.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
World of Tanks	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Valorant	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Valorant	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.86	1.79
Recency	1 September 2012	23 October 2012
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	35 Watt

HD 7600G has 84.2% lower power consumption.

NVS 510, on the other hand, has a 108.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The NVS 510 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7600G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7600G is a notebook card while NVS 510 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.