Playstation 4 Pro GPU vs Radeon HD 7620G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1114not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.60no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameDevastatorNeo
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)10 November 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842304
Core clock speed360 MHz911 MHz
Boost clock speed497 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate11.93131.2
Floating-point processing power0.3817 TFLOPS4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data217.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.06.0
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 10 November 2016
Chip lithography 32 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 150 Watt

HD 7620G has 500% lower power consumption.

Playstation 4 Pro GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7620G and Playstation 4 Pro GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7620G is a desktop card while Playstation 4 Pro GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7620G
Radeon HD 7620G
AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU
Playstation 4 Pro GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7620G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 415 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.