GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 6990M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking610not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.63no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameBlackcombGK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 July 2011 (13 years ago)13 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1120960
Core clock speed715 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1032 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate40.0482.56
Floating-point processing power1.602 TFLOPS1.981 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs5680

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s144.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 July 2011 13 September 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 140 Watt

HD 6990M has 40% lower power consumption.

GTX 660 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6990M and GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6990M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6990M
Radeon HD 6990M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6990M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 49 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.