GeForce GTX 660M vs ATI Radeon HD 5850

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5850 with GeForce GTX 660M, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5850
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
5.16
+37.2%

ATI HD 5850 outperforms GTX 660M by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking621707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.64no data
Power efficiency2.345.15
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameCypressGK107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 September 2009 (15 years ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1440384
Core clock speed725 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate52.2030.40
Floating-point processing power2.088 TFLOPS0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs7232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s64.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI++
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 API
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5850 5.16
+37.2%
GTX 660M 3.76

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5850 1988
+37.2%
GTX 660M 1449

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

ATI HD 5850 3401
+43.6%
GTX 660M 2369

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 5850 13267
+20.9%
GTX 660M 10971

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p59
+84.4%
32
−84.4%
Full HD56
+60%
35
−60%
1200p50−55
+31.6%
38
−31.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.34no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+50%
21−24
−50%
Hitman 3 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+11.9%
40−45
−11.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+50%
21−24
−50%
Hitman 3 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+11.9%
40−45
−11.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+50%
21−24
−50%
Hitman 3 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+11.9%
40−45
−11.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Hitman 3 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+39.1%
21−24
−39.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how ATI HD 5850 and GTX 660M compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5850 is 84% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 5850 is 60% faster in 1080p
  • ATI HD 5850 is 32% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI HD 5850 is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5850 is ahead in 59 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.16 3.76
Recency 30 September 2009 22 March 2012
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 50 Watt

ATI HD 5850 has a 37.2% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 660M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 202% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 5850 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5850 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 660M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5850
Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
GeForce GTX 660M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 254 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 211 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.