Radeon R7 265 vs HD 6970

Place in the ranking	536	435
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.06	5.28
Power efficiency	2.02	4.77
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	Cayman	Pitcairn
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	reference	reference
Release date	14 December 2010 (14 years ago)	13 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$369	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R7 265 has 398% better value for money than HD 6970.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	1024
Boost clock speed	880 MHz	925 MHz
Number of transistors	2,640 million	2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	550 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	84.48	59.20
Floating-point processing power	2.703 TFLOPS	1.894 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	96	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	210 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1 x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	179.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity	+	+
HDMI	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire	+	+
FreeSync	-	+
DDMA audio	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 11	DirectX® 12
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6970 7.36

R7 265 10.42
+41.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 6970 3470

R7 265 5220
+50.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−33.3%

16−18
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −32.7%	65−70 +32.7%
Hitman 3	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −39.5%	60−65 +39.5%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −35%	27−30 +35%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −40%	35−40 +40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −38.9%	75−80 +38.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −32.7%	65−70 +32.7%
Hitman 3	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −39.5%	60−65 +39.5%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −35%	27−30 +35%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −40%	35−40 +40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −38.9%	75−80 +38.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −32.7%	65−70 +32.7%
Hitman 3	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −39.5%	60−65 +39.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −40%	35−40 +40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −38.9%	75−80 +38.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22

−35%

27−30
+35%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −29.6%	35−40 +29.6%
Hitman 3	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−38.5%

18−20
+38.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Hitman 3	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−28.6%

9−10
+28.6%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.36	10.42
Recency	14 December 2010	13 February 2014
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	550 Watt	150 Watt

R7 265 has a 41.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R7 265 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6970 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.