Radeon R7 250X vs HD 6970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6970 and Radeon R7 250X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6970
2010
2 GB DDR5, 550 Watt
7.34
+25%

HD 6970 outperforms R7 250X by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking507559
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.080.62
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameCaymanCape Verde
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferencereference
Release date14 December 2010 (13 years ago)13 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$369 $99
Current price$189 (0.5x MSRP)$207 (2.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 6970 has 74% better value for money than R7 250X.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536640
Boost clock speed880 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)550 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate84.4838.00
Floating-point performance2,703.4 gflops1,216 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm210 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1 x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1625 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinity11
HDMI++
DisplayPort support--

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration--
CrossFire11
Enduro--
FreeSyncno data1
HD3D--
PowerTune--
TrueAudio--
ZeroCore--
DDMA audiono data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 11DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Mantle--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6970 7.34
+25%
R7 250X 5.87

HD 6970 outperforms R7 250X by 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 6970 2836
+25%
R7 250X 2268

HD 6970 outperforms R7 250X by 25% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 6970 3470
+21.3%
R7 250X 2860

HD 6970 outperforms R7 250X by 21% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Hitman 3 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Hitman 3 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.34 5.87
Recency 14 December 2010 13 February 2014
Cost $369 $99
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 550 Watt 80 Watt

The Radeon HD 6970 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 250X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970
Radeon HD 6970
AMD Radeon R7 250X
Radeon R7 250X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 153 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 159 votes

Rate Radeon R7 250X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.