ATI WinBoost vs Radeon HD 6750M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking842not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameWhistlerMach64
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 November 1995 (28 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed600 MHz40 MHz
Number of transistors716 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate14.40no data
Floating-point processing power0.576 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3EDO
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz40 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s320.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 1 November 1995
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 600 nm

HD 6750M has an age advantage of 15 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6750M and WinBoost. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6750M is a notebook card while WinBoost is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6750M
Radeon HD 6750M
ATI WinBoost
WinBoost

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 51 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate WinBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.