RX 6600 XT vs HD 6650M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

HD 6650M
1.94

RX 6600 XT outperforms HD 6650M by 2090% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking85778
Place by popularitynot in top-10056
Value for money0.3646.75
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameWhistler-PRONavi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years old)30 July 2021 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379
Current price$53 $283 (0.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 12886% better value for money than HD 6650M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4802048
Core clock speed600 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2589 MHz
Number of transistors716 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data160 (TGP) Watt
Texture fill rate14.40331.4
Floating-point performance576.0 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6650M and Radeon RX 6600 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6650M 1.94
RX 6600 XT 42.48
+2090%

RX 6600 XT outperforms HD 6650M by 2090% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 6650M 752
RX 6600 XT 16465
+2089%

RX 6600 XT outperforms HD 6650M by 2089% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 6650M 4051
RX 6600 XT 88163
+2077%

RX 6600 XT outperforms HD 6650M by 2077% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 6650M 1037
RX 6600 XT 39051
+3666%

RX 6600 XT outperforms HD 6650M by 3666% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p19
−2005%
400−450
+2005%
Full HD18
−633%
132
+633%
1440p3−4
−2367%
74
+2367%
4K1−2
−4000%
41
+4000%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1875%
79
+1875%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1060%
110−120
+1060%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1850%
78
+1850%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−15000%
151
+15000%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−13000%
131
+13000%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4167%
120−130
+4167%
Hitman 3 3−4
−7267%
221
+7267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−4467%
137
+4467%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1260%
65−70
+1260%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1975%
166
+1975%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1060%
110−120
+1060%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1800%
76
+1800%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−14000%
141
+14000%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−12600%
127
+12600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4167%
120−130
+4167%
Hitman 3 3−4
−6000%
183
+6000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−3533%
109
+3533%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3067%
95
+3067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1260%
65−70
+1260%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1675%
142
+1675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3420%
176
+3420%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1625%
69
+1625%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−13200%
133
+13200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−11100%
112
+11100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4167%
120−130
+4167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1880%
99
+1880%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1700%
70−75
+1700%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2140%
112
+2140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−744%
76
+744%
Metro Exodus 0−1 56
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−1580%
84
+1580%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3900%
40
+3900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3400%
105
+3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3100%
60−65
+3100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Hitman 3 2−3
−2750%
57
+2750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−150%
20
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2700%
28
+2700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1600%
51
+1600%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−960%
53
+960%

This is how HD 6650M and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • RX 6600 XT is 2005% faster than HD 6650M

1080p resolution:

  • RX 6600 XT is 633% faster than HD 6650M

1440p resolution:

  • RX 6600 XT is 2367% faster than HD 6650M

4K resolution:

  • RX 6600 XT is 4000% faster than HD 6650M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 15000% faster than the HD 6650M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6600 XT surpassed HD 6650M in all 48 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.94 42.48
Recency 4 January 2011 30 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6650M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6650M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6650M
Radeon HD 6650M
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 53 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3513 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.