Radeon 535 Mobile vs HD 6620G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1132not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameLlanoPolaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2011 (13 years ago)18 April 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400384
Core clock speed400 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors1000 Million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate8.88024.58
Floating-point performance0.3552 gflops0.7864 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data4500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data36 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2011 18 April 2017
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

HD 6620G has 42.9% lower power consumption.

535 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6620G and Radeon 535 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Radeon HD 6620G
AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
Radeon 535 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 85 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6620G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 159 votes

Rate Radeon 535 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.