GeForce Go 7950 GTX vs Radeon HD 6570M

Place in performance ranking	967	1137
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.06	no data
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	G7x (2005−2007)
GPU code name	Capilano	G71M
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	26 November 2010 (13 years ago)	12 October 2006 (17 years ago)
Current price	$338	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	32
Core clock speed	650 MHz	8 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	575 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	278 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.00	13.80
Floating-point performance	520.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6570M and GeForce Go 7950 GTX compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	MXM-II	MXM-III
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	44.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	5.0	3.0
OpenGL	4.4	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

24
+140%

10−12

−140%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7
+100%

3−4

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Hitman 3	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +80%	10−11 −80%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Hitman 3	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +80%	10−11 −80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +80%	10−11 −80%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+100%

2−3

−100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Hitman 3	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+100%

3−4

−100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+100%

2−3

−100%

This is how HD 6570M and Go 7950 GTX compete in popular games:

HD 6570M is 140% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.38	0.68
Recency	26 November 2010	12 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	45 Watt