ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670 vs GeForce Go 7950 GTX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1173not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.05no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG71M86
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 October 2006 (18 years ago)7 January 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32120
Core clock speed575 MHz680 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate13.805.440
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1632 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2006 7 January 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 30 Watt

Go 7950 GTX has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI Mobility HD 3670, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 63.6% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7950 GTX and Mobility Radeon HD 3670. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
GeForce Go 7950 GTX
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Mobility Radeon HD 3670

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 21 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.