Radeon Vega 7 vs HD 6380G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 6380G and Radeon Vega 7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
7 outperforms HD 6380G by a whopping 1302% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1286 | 594 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 13 |
| Power efficiency | 1.04 | 11.30 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | SuperSumo | Cezanne |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 June 2011 (14 years ago) | 13 April 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 160 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1900 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 9,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.200 | 53.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.128 TFLOPS | 1.702 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | 28 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 1−2
−2200%
| 23
+2200%
|
| 1440p | 1−2
−2700%
| 28
+2700%
|
| 4K | 1−2
−1700%
| 18
+1700%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 399.99 | no data |
| 1440p | 399.99 | no data |
| 4K | 399.99 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18
+1700%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−240%
|
17
+240%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14
+1300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−825%
|
37
+825%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−140%
|
12
+140%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−213%
|
24−27
+213%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−174%
|
70−75
+174%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18
−263%
|
58
+263%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−900%
|
10
+900%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−1264%
|
150−160
+1264%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−775%
|
35
+775%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−100%
|
10
+100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 13 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−188%
|
23
+188%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−260%
|
18
+260%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−170%
|
73
+170%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−800%
|
9
+800%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−1264%
|
150−160
+1264%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−575%
|
27
+575%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−160%
|
12−14
+160%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−213%
|
24−27
+213%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−160%
|
13
+160%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
+8%
|
25
−8%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−333%
|
12−14
+333%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 1−2
−5100%
|
50−55
+5100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−680%
|
35−40
+680%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−20%
|
18−20
+20%
|
| Valorant | 3−4
−733%
|
25
+733%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 28
+0%
|
28
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20
+0%
|
20
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 63
+0%
|
63
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 24
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 23
+0%
|
23
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 27
+0%
|
27
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 21
+0%
|
21
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 17
+0%
|
17
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21
+0%
|
21
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Valorant | 48
+0%
|
48
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how HD 6380G and Vega 7 compete in popular games:
- Vega 7 is 2200% faster in 1080p
- Vega 7 is 2700% faster in 1440p
- Vega 7 is 1700% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6380G is 8% faster.
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Vega 7 is 5100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD 6380G performs better in 1 test (2%)
- Vega 7 performs better in 28 tests (48%)
- there's a draw in 29 tests (50%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.45 | 6.31 |
| Recency | 14 June 2011 | 13 April 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
HD 6380G has 28.6% lower power consumption.
Vega 7, on the other hand, has a 1302.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6380G in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
