Radeon 780M vs HD 6380G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6380G with Radeon 780M, including specs and performance data.

HD 6380G
2011
35 Watt
0.47

780M outperforms HD 6380G by a whopping 3400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1279347
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.0283.46
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameSuperSumoPhoenix
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)31 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160768
Core clock speed400 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2900 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200139.2
Floating-point processing power0.128 TFLOPS8.909 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs848
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6380G 0.47
Radeon 780M 16.45
+3400%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6380G 200
Radeon 780M 6967
+3384%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−3400%
35
+3400%
1440p0−122
4K-0−113

Cost per frame, $

1080p399.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3800%
39
+3800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3000%
31
+3000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−800%
60−65
+800%
Valorant 24−27
−412%
130−140
+412%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1250%
210−220
+1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%
Dota 2 10−12
−818%
100−110
+818%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%
Metro Exodus 0−1 29
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−800%
60−65
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−820%
46
+820%
Valorant 24−27
−412%
130−140
+412%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2200%
23
+2200%
Dota 2 10−12
−818%
100−110
+818%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−800%
60−65
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−480%
29
+480%
Valorant 24−27
−412%
130−140
+412%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 27
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−12300%
120−130
+12300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−3120%
160−170
+3120%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 35−40

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−31.3%
21
+31.3%
Valorant 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 119
+0%
119
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 25
+0%
25
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65
+0%
65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

This is how HD 6380G and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is 3400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 780M is 12300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is ahead in 25 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 16.45
Recency 14 June 2011 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 780M has a 3400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6380G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6380G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 780M is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6380G
Radeon HD 6380G
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 38 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6380G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2023 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6380G or Radeon 780M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.