HD Graphics 405 vs Radeon HD 6290

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1122
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data0.01
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 8 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameZacateBraswell
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 July 2011 (12 years ago)1 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Current priceno data$254

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8016
Core clock speed280 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors292 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate5.20011.20
Floating-point performance104 gflops213.1 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6290 and HD Graphics 405 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.3
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 6290 497
HD Graphics 405 2081
+319%

HD Graphics 405 outperforms Radeon HD 6290 by 319% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 6290 179
HD Graphics 405 473
+164%

HD Graphics 405 outperforms Radeon HD 6290 by 164% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 1 July 2011 1 April 2016
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 6 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6290 and HD Graphics 405. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6290
Radeon HD 6290
Intel HD Graphics 405
HD Graphics 405

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 39 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 166 votes

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.