HD Graphics 405 vs Radeon HD 7350 PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.85
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameCedarBraswell GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 January 2012 (14 years ago)1 April 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80128
Core clock speed650 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors292 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate5.2009.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1536 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIRing Bus
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMIPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.44.3
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2012 1 April 2015
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 6 Watt

HD Graphics 405 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 216.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7350 PCI and HD Graphics 405. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7350 PCI is a desktop graphics card while HD Graphics 405 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7350 PCI
Radeon HD 7350 PCI
Intel HD Graphics 405
HD Graphics 405

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 55 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7350 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 280 votes

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7350 PCI or HD Graphics 405, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.