Quadro P620 vs Radeon HD 5570

Place in performance ranking	1003	440
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.02	20.73
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Redwood	GP107
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	9 February 2010 (14 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	$149	$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P620 has 103550% better value for money than ATI HD 5570.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	512
Core clock speed	650 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	39 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.00	43.33
Floating-point performance	520.0 gflops	1,490 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	165 mm	145 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	667 - 900 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	80.13 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5570 1.24

Quadro P620 9.39
+657%

Quadro P620 outperforms Radeon HD 5570 by 657% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 5570 479

Quadro P620 3629
+658%

Quadro P620 outperforms Radeon HD 5570 by 658% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 5570 1025

Quadro P620 5909
+476%

Quadro P620 outperforms Radeon HD 5570 by 476% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 5570 3917

Quadro P620 25105
+541%

Quadro P620 outperforms Radeon HD 5570 by 541% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	15 −633%	110−120 +633%
Full HD	23 −126%	52 +126%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−400%

14−16
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −400%	14−16 +400%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −367%	27−30 +367%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −560%	30−35 +560%
Hitman 3	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −167%	30−35 +167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1200%	24−27 +1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −200%	27−30 +200%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −400%	14−16 +400%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −967%	64 +967%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −560%	30−35 +560%
Hitman 3	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −167%	30−35 +167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1200%	24−27 +1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +50%	6 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −700%	32 +700%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −400%	14−16 +400%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −367%	27−30 +367%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −560%	30−35 +560%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −167%	30−35 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −325%	17 +325%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1200%

24−27
+1200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	6−7 −267%	21−24 +267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	5−6
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−200%

9−10
+200%

This is how ATI HD 5570 and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

Quadro P620 is 633% faster in 900p
Quadro P620 is 126% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI HD 5570 is 50% faster.
in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P620 is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

ATI HD 5570 is ahead in 1 test (3%)
Quadro P620 is ahead in 37 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.24	9.39
Recency	9 February 2010	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	39 Watt	25 Watt