Radeon RX Vega 3 vs HD 5570
Aggregate performance score
RX Vega 3 outperforms HD 5570 by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 1003 | 741 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 78 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | 1.96 |
Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | Vega (2017−2021) |
GPU code name | Redwood | Vega Raven Ridge |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 9 February 2010 (14 years ago) | 7 January 2018 (6 years ago) |
Current price | $149 | $371 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
RX Vega 3 has 9700% better value for money than ATI HD 5570.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 400 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1200 MHz |
Number of transistors | 627 million | 4,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 39 Watt | 15 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 13.00 | 12.13 |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon HD 5570 and Radeon RX Vega 3 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Length | 165 mm | no data |
Width | 1-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | System Shared |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 667 - 900 MHz | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
HDMI | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
RX Vega 3 outperforms HD 5570 by 140% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
RX Vega 3 outperforms HD 5570 by 140% in Passmark.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
RX Vega 3 outperforms HD 5570 by 68% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
RX Vega 3 outperforms HD 5570 by 39% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 15
−133%
| 35−40
+133%
|
Full HD | 23
+91.7%
| 12
−91.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−100%
|
6
+100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−120%
|
10−12
+120%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−100%
|
8
+100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−25%
|
15
+25%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−200%
|
6
+200%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−55.6%
|
14
+55.6%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−100%
|
12
+100%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−120%
|
10−12
+120%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−8.3%
|
13
+8.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
+80%
|
5
−80%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−50%
|
6
+50%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−120%
|
10−12
+120%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
+33.3%
|
9
−33.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
4K
High Preset
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
This is how ATI HD 5570 and RX Vega 3 compete in popular games:
- RX Vega 3 is 133% faster in 900p
- ATI HD 5570 is 92% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI HD 5570 is 80% faster than the RX Vega 3.
- in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 3 is 400% faster than the ATI HD 5570.
All in all, in popular games:
- ATI HD 5570 is ahead in 2 tests (5%)
- RX Vega 3 is ahead in 34 tests (89%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (5%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.24 | 2.97 |
Recency | 9 February 2010 | 7 January 2018 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | System Shared |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 39 Watt | 15 Watt |
The Radeon RX Vega 3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5570 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 5570 is a desktop card while Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.