FirePro M5950 vs Radeon HD 4870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

ATI HD 4870
2008
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
3.54
+4.1%

Radeon HD 4870 outperforms FirePro M5950 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking682694
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.270.29
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRV770Whistler-XT
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date25 June 2008 (15 years ago)13 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data
Current price$162 (0.5x MSRP)$386

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro M5950 has 7% better value for money than ATI HD 4870.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800480
Core clock speed750 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors956 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate30.0017.40
Floating-point performance1,200.0 gflops696.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 4870 and FirePro M5950 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length250 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorno dataMXM-A
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s57 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4870 3.54
+4.1%
FirePro M5950 3.40

Radeon HD 4870 outperforms FirePro M5950 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 4870 1370
+4.3%
FirePro M5950 1314

Radeon HD 4870 outperforms FirePro M5950 by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p24−27
+0%
24
+0%
Full HD24−27
+0%
24
+0%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.54 3.40
Recency 25 June 2008 13 April 2011
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 4870 and FirePro M5950.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4870 is a desktop card while FirePro M5950 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4870
Radeon HD 4870
AMD FirePro M5950
FirePro M5950

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 222 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 50 votes

Rate FirePro M5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.