GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs ATI Radeon HD 4770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4700 4710 4720 4730 4730 OEM 4750 4770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 460 768MB 460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4770 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4770
2009, $109
512 MB GDDR5, 80 Watt
2.16

460 768MB outperforms HD 4770 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI HD 4770 HD 4770
GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 768MB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking907736
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.32no data
Power efficiency2.08no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRV740no data
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 April 2009 (16 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640336
Core clock speed750 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors826 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.96 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length203 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−95.8%
47
+95.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.54no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how ATI HD 4770 and GTX 460 768MB compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 768MB is 96% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.16 3.98

GTX 460 768MB has a 84.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4770 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

ATI Radeon HD 4770
Radeon HD 4770
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI HD 4770 Radeon HD 4770
vs
R7 240 Radeon R7 240
GTX 460 768MB GeForce GTX 460 768MB
vs
HD 7750 Radeon HD 7750
ATI HD 4770 Radeon HD 4770
vs
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
ATI HD 4810 ATI Radeon HD 4810
vs
RX 7600S RX 7600S
ATI HD 3410 ATI Radeon HD 3410
vs
ATI HD 2900 PRO HD 2900 PRO
ATI HD 3410 ATI Radeon HD 3410
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5670 Mac Edition Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition
ATI HD 3410 ATI Radeon HD 3410
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5850 Mac Edition Radeon HD 5850 Mac Edition
ATI HD 3410 ATI Radeon HD 3410
vs
B200 SXM 192 GB SXM 192 GB
ATI HD 4770 ATI Radeon HD 4770
vs
ATI HD 5670 HD 5670
ATI HD 4770 ATI Radeon HD 4770
vs
ATI HD 3100 HD 3100
ATI HD 4770 ATI Radeon HD 4770
vs
RX 550 Mobile RX 550 Mobile
ATI HD 4770 ATI Radeon HD 4770
vs
GeForce 800M GeForce 800M
ATI HD 4770 ATI Radeon HD 4770
vs
HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 75 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 108 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4770 or GeForce GTX 460 768MB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.