Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 vs ATI HD 4770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking907not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.32no data
Power efficiency2.08no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRV740Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 April 2009 (16 years ago)31 January 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401536
Core clock speed750 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors826 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt185 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0088.80
Floating-point processing power0.96 TFLOPS2.842 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3296
L1 Cache128 KB384 KB
L2 Cache128 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length203 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s240.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 April 2009 31 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 185 Watt

ATI HD 4770 has 131.3% lower power consumption.

HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4770 and Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4770
Radeon HD 4770
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 75 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4770 or Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.