FirePro M5950 vs ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated727
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.77
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRV730Whistler
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date17 July 2007 (17 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320480
Core clock speed750 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors514 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0017.40
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS0.696 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs3224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfaceAGP 8xMXM-A (3.0)
Length193 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorno dataMXM-A

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s57 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 July 2007 4 January 2011
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 35 Watt

FirePro M5950 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 68.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4670 AGP and FirePro M5950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4670 AGP is a desktop card while FirePro M5950 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP
Radeon HD 4670 AGP
AMD FirePro M5950
FirePro M5950

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 54 votes

Rate FirePro M5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.