RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) with RTX 5880 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.34

RTX 5880 Ada Generation outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 1964% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking6704
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRaphaelAD102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 September 2022 (1 year ago)5 January 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12814080
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2460 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data285 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,082

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data48 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data18 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−1844%
350−400
+1844%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1823%
500−550
+1823%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−1797%
550−600
+1797%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−1900%
220−230
+1900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1775%
300−310
+1775%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1945%
900−950
+1945%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1823%
500−550
+1823%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−1797%
550−600
+1797%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−1900%
220−230
+1900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−1900%
220−230
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1959%
350−400
+1959%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1945%
900−950
+1945%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1823%
500−550
+1823%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1959%
350−400
+1959%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1945%
900−950
+1945%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−1900%
220−230
+1900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−1937%
550−600
+1937%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and RTX 5880 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 1844% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.34 89.59
Recency 26 September 2022 5 January 2024
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm

RTX 5880 Ada Generation has a 1964.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook card while RTX 5880 Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RTX 5880 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 222 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 15 votes

Rate RTX 5880 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.