GeForce 9400M vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and GeForce 9400M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.43
+1604%

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) outperforms 9400M by a whopping 1604% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6691355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.49
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRaphaelC79
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 September 2022 (2 years ago)15 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12816
Core clock speedno data580 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data314 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.640
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD170−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Elden Ring 12−14 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 17 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 0−1
Valorant 10−12 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 14 0−1
Elden Ring 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 23
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Fortnite 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Forza Horizon 4 11 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1
Valorant 10−12 0−1
World of Tanks 70−75
+1750%
4−5
−1750%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 37
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Forza Horizon 4 9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Valorant 10−12 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Elden Ring 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
World of Tanks 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Elden Ring 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Valorant 4−5 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.43 0.26
Recency 26 September 2022 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 6 nm 65 nm

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has a 1603.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
GeForce 9400M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 257 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 44 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.