Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) with Quadro P3200 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.35

P3200 Max-Q outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 454% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking641216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2023)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRaphaelGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date26 September 2022 (1 year ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281792
Core clock speedno data1139 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1404 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data157.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Quadro P3200 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data7012 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−428%
95−100
+428%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%
Hitman 3 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−445%
240−250
+445%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%
Hitman 3 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−445%
60−65
+445%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−429%
90−95
+429%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−445%
240−250
+445%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%
Hitman 3 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9
−400%
45−50
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
−400%
45−50
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−429%
90−95
+429%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−445%
240−250
+445%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Hitman 3 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−419%
140−150
+419%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and P3200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • P3200 Max-Q is 428% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.35 24.09
Recency 26 September 2022 21 February 2018
Chip lithography 6 nm 16 nm

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

P3200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 453.8% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 220 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 19 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.