Radeon Steam Deck 8CU vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Steam Deck 8CU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 Max-Q with Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, including specs and performance data.

P3200 Max-Q
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
21.91
+114%

P3200 Max-Q outperforms Steam Deck 8CU by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P3200 Max-Q P3200 Max-Q
Steam Deck 8CU Steam Deck 8CU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking293485
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.49no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP104RDNA 2 Sephiroth
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (8 years ago)9 November 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792512
Core clock speed1139 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1404 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate157.2no data
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data
L1 Cache672 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB1 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1753 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+114%
28
−114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how P3200 Max-Q and Steam Deck 8CU compete in popular games:

  • P3200 Max-Q is 114% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 21.91 10.22
Recency 21 February 2018 9 November 2023
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm

P3200 Max-Q has a 114.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Steam Deck 8CU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Steam Deck 8CU in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
Steam Deck 8CU Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
ATI V8700 Duo FirePro V8700 Duo
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
ATI V8700 Duo FirePro V8700 Duo
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q
ATI V8700 Duo FirePro V8700 Duo
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
HD 6250 IGP HD 6250 IGP
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
H800 SXM5 H800 SXM5
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
Go 6150 + nForce Go 430 Go 6150 + nForce Go 430
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
ION ION
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
Volari 8300
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Iris Pro Graphics P555 Iris Pro Graphics P555
vs
8200M G mGPU GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.7 27 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Radeon Steam Deck 8CU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 Max-Q or Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.