GeForce GTX 590 vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) with GeForce GTX 590, including specs and performance data.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.03

GTX 590 outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking697522
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.72
Power efficiencyno data1.62
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRaphaelGF110
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 September 2022 (2 years ago)24 March 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281024 ×2
Core clock speedno data607 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data365 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rateno data38.91 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data1.244 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data48 ×2
TMUsno data64 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) ×2
Memory bus widthno data768-bit (384-bit per GPU) ×2
Memory clock speedno data1707 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data327.7 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataThree Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.2
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 4.03
GTX 590 7.93
+96.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 3026
GTX 590 9167
+203%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 11703
GTX 590 25720
+120%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 2338
GTX 590 6680
+186%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p21−24
−124%
47
+124%
Full HD19
−484%
111
+484%
1200p55−60
−104%
112
+104%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.30

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−163%
40−45
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−125%
35−40
+125%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−163%
40−45
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Fortnite 24−27
−104%
45−50
+104%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−89.5%
35−40
+89.5%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−70.6%
27−30
+70.6%
Valorant 55−60
−49.1%
80−85
+49.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−125%
35−40
+125%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−163%
40−45
+163%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−74%
120−130
+74%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Dota 2 41
−48.8%
60−65
+48.8%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Fortnite 24−27
−104%
45−50
+104%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−89.5%
35−40
+89.5%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−70.6%
27−30
+70.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Valorant 55−60
−49.1%
80−85
+49.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−125%
35−40
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Dota 2 37
−64.9%
60−65
+64.9%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−89.5%
35−40
+89.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−70.6%
27−30
+70.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Valorant 55−60
−49.1%
80−85
+49.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−104%
45−50
+104%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−100%
60−65
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−30.3%
40−45
+30.3%
Valorant 45−50
−104%
90−95
+104%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−11.8%
18−20
+11.8%
Valorant 21−24
−100%
40−45
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and GTX 590 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 590 is 124% faster in 900p
  • GTX 590 is 484% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 590 is 104% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 590 is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 590 is ahead in 59 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 7.93
Recency 26 September 2022 24 March 2011
Chip lithography 6 nm 40 nm

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 590, on the other hand, has a 96.8% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 590 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 590 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 590

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 277 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 54 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) or GeForce GTX 590, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.