GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs ATI Radeon E2400

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon E2400 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI E2400
2007
128 MB GDDR3, 25 Watt
0.13

RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms ATI E2400 by a whopping 27977% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1428131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.3622.08
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV610TU104B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 June 2007 (17 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores402560
Core clock speed600 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistors180 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400220.8
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPS7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1120
1440p-0−177
4K-0−145

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+0%
104
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 83
+0%
83
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 115
+0%
115
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 162
+0%
162
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 105
+0%
105
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+0%
119
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71
+0%
71
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 101
+0%
101
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 112
+0%
112
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 104
+0%
104
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+0%
63
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61
+0%
61
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75
+0%
75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 92
+0%
92
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+0%
121
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+0%
87
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 61
+0%
61
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+0%
108
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75
+0%
75
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+0%
56
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55
+0%
55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 61
+0%
61
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 89
+0%
89
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+0%
84
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+0%
41
+0%
Hitman 3 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 67
+0%
67
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+0%
59
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
+0%
36
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+0%
32
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
+0%
25
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+0%
43
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.13 36.50
Recency 28 June 2007 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 115 Watt

ATI E2400 has 360% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 27976.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E2400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon E2400
Radeon E2400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 393 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.