Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon E4690

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon E4690 with Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, including specs and performance data.

ATI E4690
2009
512 MB GDDR3, 30 Watt
1.05

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms ATI E4690 by a whopping 607% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1061502
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameRV730Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 June 2009 (15 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32080
Core clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors514 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20no data
Floating-point performance384.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon E4690 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceMXM-IIno data
WidthMXM Moduleno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.0no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−800%
18
+800%
1440p1−2
−900%
10
+900%
4K2−3
−650%
15
+650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14
+1300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−850%
19
+850%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−633%
21−24
+633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%
Hitman 3 2−3
−700%
16
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−700%
32
+700%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−660%
38
+660%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−650%
30
+650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−700%
16
+700%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−700%
16
+700%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−633%
21−24
+633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10
+900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%
Hitman 3 2−3
−700%
16
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−725%
30−35
+725%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−733%
25
+733%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−700%
24
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−633%
22
+633%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−717%
49
+717%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8
+700%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−700%
16
+700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−900%
20
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 7−8
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Hitman 3 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−700%
16
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−900%
10
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 4−5

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 6−7
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 5−6
Hitman 3 0−1 4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 3−4
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 4−5

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 4−5
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 3−4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 3−4
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 0−1 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 7−8

This is how ATI E4690 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 800% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 900% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 650% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.05 7.42
Recency 1 June 2009 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 28 Watt

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E4690 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon E4690 is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon E4690
Radeon E4690
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 819 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.