Arc Graphics 24EU vs Radeon AI PRO R9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0 (2025)Xe2-LPG (2024−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 48Arrow Lake
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release dateJuly 202524 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096192
Core clock speed1660 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2920 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors53,900 million17,800 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate747.524.00
Floating-point processing power47.84 TFLOPS0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs1286
TMUs25612
Tensor Cores128no data
Ray Tracing Cores64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2518 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth644.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1aMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 65 Watt

Arc Graphics 24EU has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 361.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon AI PRO R9700 and Arc Graphics 24EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 24EU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700
Intel Arc Graphics 24EU
Arc Graphics 24EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 24EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon AI PRO R9700 or Arc Graphics 24EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.