Quadro P1000 vs Radeon 860M

Radeon 860M Radeon 880M Radeon 890M Radeon 8050S Radeon 8060S
VS
Quadro P1000 Quadro P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Max-Q Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 860M with Quadro P1000, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 860M
2025
15 Watt
10.98
+2.9%

860M outperforms P1000 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking426432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.72
Power efficiency54.6519.92
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameStrix PointGP107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2025 (recently)7 February 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$375

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512640
Core clock speed400 MHz1493 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHz1519 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate96.0048.61
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS1.555 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3232
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96.13 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 860M 10.98
+2.9%
Quadro P1000 10.67

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 860M 4626
+2.8%
Quadro P1000 4498

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−76%
44
+76%
4K10−12
−10%
11
+10%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.52
4Kno data34.09

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+15.6%
32
−15.6%
Fortnite 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+2.6%
35−40
−2.6%
Valorant 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+1.9%
160−170
−1.9%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+27.6%
29
−27.6%
Fortnite 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
−70.8%
40−45
+70.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+2.6%
35−40
−2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−3.4%
30
+3.4%
Valorant 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+37%
27
−37%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+2.6%
35−40
−2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+81.3%
16
−81.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+2.4%
80−85
−2.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+1.7%
120−130
−1.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+3.6%
27−30
−3.6%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Valorant 55−60
+1.7%
55−60
−1.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how Radeon 860M and Quadro P1000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P1000 is 76% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P1000 is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 860M is 81% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P1000 is 71% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 860M is ahead in 36 tests (55%)
  • Quadro P1000 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (42%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.98 10.67
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt

Radeon 860M has a 2.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon 860M and Quadro P1000.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook card while Quadro P1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
Radeon 860M AMD Radeon 860M
vs
S9300 X2 S9300 X2
Radeon 860M AMD Radeon 860M
vs
FirePro S7150 FirePro S7150
Radeon 860M AMD Radeon 860M
vs
S7150 x2 S7150 x2
Radeon 860M AMD Radeon 860M
vs
FirePro W4300 FirePro W4300
Radeon 860M AMD Radeon 860M
vs
FirePro S9170 FirePro S9170
Radeon 860M AMD Radeon 860M
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
Radeon 860M AMD Radeon 860M
vs
Quadro P600 Quadro P600
Quadro P2000 NVIDIA Quadro P2000
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M AMD Radeon 860M
vs
M3000 SE M3000 SE
Quadro P6000 NVIDIA Quadro P6000
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 599 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or Quadro P1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.