Radeon 820M vs 840M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon 840M and Radeon 820M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
840M outperforms 820M by a whopping 603% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 501 | 1052 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | RDNA 3+ (2024) | RDNA 3+ (2024) |
GPU code name | Krackan Point | Krackan Point |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 2 June 2024 (1 year ago) | 2 June 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | 128 |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 2900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory clock speed | 7500 MHz | 7500 MHz |
Shared memory | + | + |
Resizable BAR | + | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Octane Render OctaneBench
This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 28
+833%
| 3−4
−833%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 84
+740%
|
10−11
−740%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+183%
|
6−7
−183%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+4000%
|
1−2
−4000%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 68
+656%
|
9−10
−656%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+900%
|
3−4
−900%
|
Fortnite | 55−60
+1300%
|
4−5
−1300%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+400%
|
8−9
−400%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+2700%
|
1−2
−2700%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+183%
|
6−7
−183%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+267%
|
9−10
−267%
|
Valorant | 90−95
+165%
|
30−35
−165%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+4000%
|
1−2
−4000%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 15
+650%
|
2−3
−650%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
+370%
|
30−33
−370%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+900%
|
3−4
−900%
|
Fortnite | 55−60
+1300%
|
4−5
−1300%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+400%
|
8−9
−400%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+2700%
|
1−2
−2700%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 32
+3100%
|
1−2
−3100%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+183%
|
6−7
−183%
|
Metro Exodus | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+267%
|
9−10
−267%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+243%
|
7−8
−243%
|
Valorant | 90−95
+165%
|
30−35
−165%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+4000%
|
1−2
−4000%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+900%
|
3−4
−900%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+400%
|
8−9
−400%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+183%
|
6−7
−183%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+267%
|
9−10
−267%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+243%
|
7−8
−243%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 55−60
+1300%
|
4−5
−1300%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+788%
|
8−9
−788%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
Valorant | 100−110
+1960%
|
5−6
−1960%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+550%
|
2−3
−550%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 18−20
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+33.3%
|
14−16
−33.3%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
Valorant | 45−50
+586%
|
7−8
−586%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+650%
|
2−3
−650%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
This is how Radeon 840M and Radeon 820M compete in popular games:
- Radeon 840M is 833% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 840M is 4000% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Radeon 840M surpassed Radeon 820M in all 45 of our tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.