HD Graphics 400 vs Radeon 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8060S and HD Graphics 400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 8060S
2025
55 Watt
42.18
+3956%

8060S outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 3956% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking971122
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency58.4113.20
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameStrix HaloBraswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)1 April 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256096
Core clock speed1295 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate373.67.200
Floating-point processing power11.96 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs642
TMUs16012
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3L
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8060S 42.18
+3956%
HD Graphics 400 1.04

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 8060S 27659
+6046%
HD Graphics 400 450

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132
+4300%
3−4
−4300%
1440p79
+7800%
1−2
−7800%
4K52
+5100%
1−2
−5100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+4520%
5−6
−4520%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+4950%
2−3
−4950%
God of War 117
+5750%
2−3
−5750%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+4567%
3−4
−4567%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+4200%
5−6
−4200%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+4950%
2−3
−4950%
Far Cry 5 106
+5200%
2−3
−5200%
Fortnite 180−190
+4450%
4−5
−4450%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+4000%
4−5
−4000%
Forza Horizon 5 201
+4925%
4−5
−4925%
God of War 96
+4700%
2−3
−4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+3975%
4−5
−3975%
Valorant 240−250
+4740%
5−6
−4740%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+4567%
3−4
−4567%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+5350%
2−3
−5350%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+4533%
6−7
−4533%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+4950%
2−3
−4950%
Far Cry 5 104
+5100%
2−3
−5100%
Fortnite 180−190
+4450%
4−5
−4450%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+4000%
4−5
−4000%
Forza Horizon 5 182
+4450%
4−5
−4450%
God of War 76
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+4133%
3−4
−4133%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+5050%
2−3
−5050%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+3975%
4−5
−3975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 218
+4260%
5−6
−4260%
Valorant 240−250
+4740%
5−6
−4740%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+4567%
3−4
−4567%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+4950%
2−3
−4950%
Far Cry 5 97
+4750%
2−3
−4750%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+4000%
4−5
−4000%
God of War 49
+4800%
1−2
−4800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+3975%
4−5
−3975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 114
+5600%
2−3
−5600%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+4450%
4−5
−4450%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
+7000%
1−2
−7000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+4157%
7−8
−4157%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+6300%
1−2
−6300%
Valorant 270−280
+4433%
6−7
−4433%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+5250%
2−3
−5250%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Far Cry 5 89
+4350%
2−3
−4350%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+4067%
3−4
−4067%
God of War 40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+4150%
2−3
−4150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+5650%
2−3
−5650%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Metro Exodus 40−45 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Valorant 250−260
+4200%
6−7
−4200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+6700%
1−2
−6700%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 0−1
Far Cry 5 49
+4800%
1−2
−4800%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+4100%
2−3
−4100%
God of War 35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+6000%
1−2
−6000%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%

This is how Radeon 8060S and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is 4300% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8060S is 7800% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 5100% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.18 1.04
Recency 6 January 2025 1 April 2015
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 6 Watt

Radeon 8060S has a 3955.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has 816.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 39 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 443 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or HD Graphics 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.