HD Graphics 400 vs Radeon 8050S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8050S and HD Graphics 400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 8050S
2025
37.64
+3519%

8050S outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 3519% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1311122
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.20
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameStrix PointBraswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2025 (recently)1 April 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204896
Core clock speed1295 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data6 Watt
Texture fill rate298.97.200
Floating-point processing power9.564 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs642
TMUs12812
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3L
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8050S 37.64
+3519%
HD Graphics 400 1.04

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 8050S 23521
+5127%
HD Graphics 400 450

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD108
+5300%
2−3
−5300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Sons of the Forest 80−85
+3950%
2−3
−3950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+4267%
3−4
−4267%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Far Cry 5 100
+4900%
2−3
−4900%
Fortnite 160−170
+4025%
4−5
−4025%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+3575%
4−5
−3575%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+3867%
3−4
−3867%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+3650%
4−5
−3650%
Sons of the Forest 80−85
+3950%
2−3
−3950%
Valorant 220−230
+3617%
6−7
−3617%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+4267%
3−4
−4267%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+3871%
7−8
−3871%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Far Cry 5 96
+4700%
2−3
−4700%
Fortnite 160−170
+4025%
4−5
−4025%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+3575%
4−5
−3575%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+3867%
3−4
−3867%
Grand Theft Auto V 118
+3833%
3−4
−3833%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+4450%
2−3
−4450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+3650%
4−5
−3650%
Sons of the Forest 80−85
+3950%
2−3
−3950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+3800%
4−5
−3800%
Valorant 220−230
+3617%
6−7
−3617%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+4267%
3−4
−4267%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Far Cry 5 85
+4150%
2−3
−4150%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+3575%
4−5
−3575%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+3650%
4−5
−3650%
Sons of the Forest 80−85
+3950%
2−3
−3950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+4500%
2−3
−4500%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
+4025%
4−5
−4025%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+3686%
7−8
−3686%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+3750%
2−3
−3750%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Valorant 250−260
+3543%
7−8
−3543%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+4800%
2−3
−4800%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+4500%
2−3
−4500%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+5300%
2−3
−5300%
Sons of the Forest 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+7100%
1−2
−7100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−105
+4900%
2−3
−4900%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+3950%
2−3
−3950%
Metro Exodus 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Valorant 230−240
+3767%
6−7
−3767%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+7100%
1−2
−7100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Sons of the Forest 30−35 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+4800%
1−2
−4800%

This is how Radeon 8050S and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8050S is 5300% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.64 1.04
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm

Radeon 8050S has a 3519.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 443 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8050S or HD Graphics 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.