HD Graphics 400 vs Radeon 8050S

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8050S and HD Graphics 400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 8050S
2025
39.38
+3723%

8050S outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 3723% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking961100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.82
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameStrix PointBraswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2025 (recently)1 April 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204896
Core clock speed1295 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data6 Watt
Texture fill rate298.97.200
Floating-point processing power9.564 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs642
TMUs12812
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3L
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.38 1.03
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm

Radeon 8050S has a 3723.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 423 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8050S or HD Graphics 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.