Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs Radeon 8050S

VS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8050S with Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 8050S
2025
37.29
+20.1%

8050S outperforms RTX 5000 Mobile by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Radeon 8050S Radeon 8050S
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking93146
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.38
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameStrix PointTU104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date2025 (recently)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483072
Core clock speed1295 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data110 Watt
Texture fill rate298.9296.6
Floating-point processing power9.564 TFLOPS9.492 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Cores3248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD150−160
+13.6%
132
−13.6%
1440p100−110
+19%
84
−19%
4K60−65
+11.1%
54
−11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Battlefield 5 165
+0%
165
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 128
+0%
128
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Battlefield 5 162
+0%
162
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Far Cry 5 123
+0%
123
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+0%
181
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 152
+0%
152
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Far Cry 5 115
+0%
115
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+0%
100
+0%
Valorant 181
+0%
181
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how Radeon 8050S and RTX 5000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8050S is 14% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8050S is 19% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8050S is 11% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 37.29 31.06
Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm

Radeon 8050S has a 20.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8050S is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
vs
Pro Vega 64X Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200
Radeon 8050S 8050S
vs
RX 540X RX 540X
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
RX 540X RX 540X
Radeon 8050S 8050S
vs
RX 640 RX 640
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
RX 640 RX 640
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile
Radeon 8050S 8050S
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile RTX 4000 Mobile
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile RTX 4000 Mobile
Radeon 8050S 8050S
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
Radeon 8060S 8060S
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 42 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8050S or Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.