Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs Radeon 8050S

VS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8050S with Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 8050S
2025
37.29
+27.2%

8050S outperforms RTX 4000 Mobile by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Radeon 8050S Radeon 8050S
RTX 4000 Mobile RTX 4000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking93165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.14
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameStrix PointTU104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date2025 (recently)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482560
Core clock speed1295 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data110 Watt
Texture fill rate298.9249.6
Floating-point processing power9.564 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Cores3240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+21.5%
107
−21.5%
1440p80−85
+27%
63
−27%
4K55−60
+17%
47
−17%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 87
+0%
87
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143
+0%
143
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+0%
75
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Radeon 8050S and RTX 4000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8050S is 21% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8050S is 27% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8050S is 17% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 37.29 29.32
Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm

Radeon 8050S has a 27.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8050S is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
vs
RX 540X RX 540X
Radeon 8050S Radeon 8050S
vs
RX 640 RX 640
Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
vs
RX 640 RX 640
Radeon 8050S Radeon 8050S
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile
Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile
Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile RTX 4000 Mobile
Radeon 8050S Radeon 8050S
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
Radeon 8050S Radeon 8050S
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 34 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8050S or Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.