Riva TNT2 vs Radeon 780M

Place in the ranking	362	1592
Place by popularity	33	not in top-100
Power efficiency	84.34	no data
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)	Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code name	Phoenix	NV5
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	31 January 2024 (2 years ago)	12 October 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	800 MHz	125 MHz
Boost clock speed	2900 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	25,390 million	15 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	139.2	0.25
Floating-point processing power	8.909 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	2
TMUs	48	2
Ray Tracing Cores	12	no data
L0 Cache	192 KB	no data
L1 Cache	256 KB	no data
L2 Cache	2 MB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	AGP 4x
Width	IGP	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	SDR
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	16 MB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	150 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	2.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

Motherboard Dependent

1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	6.0
Shader Model	6.8	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.2
OpenCL	2.1	N/A
Vulkan	1.3	N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 780M 16.43
+164200%

Riva TNT2 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 780M 6849
+228200%

Samples: 10203

Riva TNT2 3
Samples: 24

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35	-0−1
1440p	24	-0−1
4K	14	-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	119	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	39	0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake	25	0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	70−75	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	82	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	31	0−1
Far Cry 5	45	0−1
Fortnite	90−95	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	65−70	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	65	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65	0−1
Valorant	130−140	0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	70−75	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	39	0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	210−220	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	24	0−1
Dota 2	100−110	0−1
Far Cry 5	41	0−1
Fortnite	90−95	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	65−70	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	60	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	44	0−1
Metro Exodus	29	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46	0−1
Valorant	130−140	0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	70−75	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	23	0−1
Dota 2	100−110	0−1
Far Cry 5	39	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	65−70	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	29	0−1
Valorant	130−140	0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

90−95

0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	27	0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	120−130	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	18	0−1
Metro Exodus	21−24	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170	0−1
Valorant	160−170	0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	45−50	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	16	0−1
Far Cry 5	27	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	40−45	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20	0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

35−40

0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	6	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	21	0−1
Metro Exodus	12−14	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15	0−1
Valorant	90−95	0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	24−27	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	14−16	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6	0−1
Dota 2	55−60	0−1
Far Cry 5	12	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	27−30	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18	0−1