Radeon PRO W7800 vs 780M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 780M with Radeon PRO W7800, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 780M
2023
15 Watt
18.29

PRO W7800 outperforms 780M by a whopping 304% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30414
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data31.10
Power efficiency84.1319.63
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameHawx PointNavi 31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 December 2023 (1 year ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684480
Core clock speed800 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speed2700 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate129.6707.0
Floating-point processing power8.294 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs48280
Ray Tracing Cores1270

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 780M 18.29
PRO W7800 73.96
+304%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 780M 7032
PRO W7800 28439
+304%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−300%
140−150
+300%
1440p17
−282%
65−70
+282%
4K14
−293%
55−60
+293%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data17.85
1440pno data38.45
4Kno data45.44

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 32
−275%
120−130
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
−285%
150−160
+285%
Elden Ring 37
−278%
140−150
+278%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−290%
230−240
+290%
Counter-Strike 2 26
−285%
100−105
+285%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−300%
60−65
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 65
−300%
260−270
+300%
Metro Exodus 44
−286%
170−180
+286%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−295%
170−180
+295%
Valorant 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−290%
230−240
+290%
Counter-Strike 2 25
−300%
100−105
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
−275%
45−50
+275%
Dota 2 29
−279%
110−120
+279%
Elden Ring 42
−281%
160−170
+281%
Far Cry 5 32
−275%
120−130
+275%
Fortnite 95−100
−304%
400−450
+304%
Forza Horizon 4 54
−289%
210−220
+289%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
−300%
180−190
+300%
Metro Exodus 32
−275%
120−130
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−297%
500−550
+297%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−295%
170−180
+295%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−304%
230−240
+304%
Valorant 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%
World of Tanks 220−230
−286%
850−900
+286%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−290%
230−240
+290%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
−275%
45−50
+275%
Dota 2 65−70
−300%
260−270
+300%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−297%
250−260
+297%
Forza Horizon 4 46
−291%
180−190
+291%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−297%
500−550
+297%
Valorant 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18
−289%
70−75
+289%
Elden Ring 30−33
−300%
120−130
+300%
Grand Theft Auto V 19
−295%
75−80
+295%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−292%
650−700
+292%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
World of Tanks 120−130
−300%
500−550
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−278%
140−150
+278%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−296%
190−200
+296%
Forza Horizon 4 32
−275%
120−130
+275%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−290%
160−170
+290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−300%
80−85
+300%
Valorant 45−50
−304%
190−200
+304%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Dota 2 21
−281%
80−85
+281%
Elden Ring 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Grand Theft Auto V 21
−281%
80−85
+281%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−300%
220−230
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
−281%
80−85
+281%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Dota 2 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−291%
90−95
+291%
Fortnite 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−282%
65−70
+282%
Valorant 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%

This is how Radeon 780M and PRO W7800 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7800 is 300% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7800 is 282% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7800 is 293% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.29 73.96
Recency 6 December 2023 13 April 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 260 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 7 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1633.3% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800, on the other hand, has a 304.4% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon PRO W7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 780M is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1624 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 35 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.