Radeon RX 6300 vs 760M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 760M with Radeon RX 6300, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 760M
2023
15 Watt
14.51
+2.2%

760M outperforms RX 6300 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking362368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency67.9331.16
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameHawx PointNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 December 2023 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate83.1797.92
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3248
Ray Tracing Cores812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared32 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x HDMI 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 760M 14.51
+2.2%
RX 6300 14.20

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 760M 5708
+2.2%
RX 6300 5586

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD33
+10%
30−35
−10%
1440p24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Counter-Strike 2 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Fortnite 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Valorant 110−120
+5.5%
110−120
−5.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Counter-Strike 2 18
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+5.6%
180−190
−5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Dota 2 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Far Cry 5 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Fortnite 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Valorant 110−120
+5.5%
110−120
−5.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Dota 2 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Far Cry 5 33
+10%
30−33
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Valorant 110−120
+5.5%
110−120
−5.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+4%
100−105
−4%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+7.5%
120−130
−7.5%
Valorant 140−150
+3.6%
140−150
−3.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Valorant 75−80
+8.6%
70−75
−8.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Dota 2 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

This is how Radeon 760M and RX 6300 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 760M is 10% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 760M is 14% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.51 14.20
Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 32 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 2.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 113.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon 760M and Radeon RX 6300.

Be aware that Radeon 760M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6300 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
AMD Radeon RX 6300
Radeon RX 6300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 231 vote

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 760M or Radeon RX 6300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.