GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs Radeon 680M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 680M and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 680M
2023
50 Watt
8.14

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile outperforms 680M by a whopping 570% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking53155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.7865.81
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRembrandt+GB205
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)March 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685888
Core clock speed2000 MHz847 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1447 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate105.6266.2
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS17.04 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs48184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Cores1246

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 680M 8.14
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 54.57
+570%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 680M 3334
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 22342
+570%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD37
−549%
240−250
+549%
1440p17
−547%
110−120
+547%
4K11
−536%
70−75
+536%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 32
−556%
210−220
+556%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−567%
280−290
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
−558%
250−260
+558%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 24
−567%
160−170
+567%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−567%
240−250
+567%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−567%
280−290
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
−543%
180−190
+543%
Far Cry 5 38
−558%
250−260
+558%
Fortnite 45−50
−512%
300−310
+512%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−567%
240−250
+567%
Forza Horizon 5 52
−477%
300−310
+477%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−555%
190−200
+555%
Valorant 80−85
−510%
500−550
+510%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 20
−550%
130−140
+550%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−567%
240−250
+567%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−567%
280−290
+567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−569%
850−900
+569%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−567%
140−150
+567%
Dota 2 71
−534%
450−500
+534%
Far Cry 5 35
−557%
230−240
+557%
Fortnite 45−50
−512%
300−310
+512%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−567%
240−250
+567%
Forza Horizon 5 46
−552%
300−310
+552%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
−567%
240−250
+567%
Metro Exodus 23
−552%
150−160
+552%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−555%
190−200
+555%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
−550%
260−270
+550%
Valorant 80−85
−510%
500−550
+510%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 20
−550%
130−140
+550%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−567%
240−250
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−567%
120−130
+567%
Dota 2 61
−556%
400−450
+556%
Far Cry 5 33
−567%
220−230
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−567%
240−250
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−555%
190−200
+555%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−567%
160−170
+567%
Valorant 146
−551%
950−1000
+551%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−512%
300−310
+512%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
−545%
400−450
+545%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−547%
110−120
+547%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−551%
280−290
+551%
Valorant 90−95
−552%
600−650
+552%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−567%
120−130
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−550%
65−70
+550%
Far Cry 5 21
−567%
140−150
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−532%
120−130
+532%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−547%
110−120
+547%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−532%
120−130
+532%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−554%
85−90
+554%
Valorant 40−45
−567%
280−290
+567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−500%
24−27
+500%
Dota 2 18
−567%
120−130
+567%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−554%
85−90
+554%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%

This is how Radeon 680M and RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 549% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 547% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 536% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.14 54.57
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 60 Watt

Radeon 680M has 20% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 570.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 680M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1052 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 93 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 680M or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.