Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon 680M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 680M with Arc Pro A30M, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 680M
2023
50 Watt
14.17

Arc Pro A30M outperforms 680M by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking368349
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.5120.98
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRembrandt+DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Core clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate105.6128.0
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4864
Ray Tracing Cores128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 680M 14.17
Arc Pro A30M 15.24
+7.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 680M 5448
Arc Pro A30M 5862
+7.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD37
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
1440p18
+0%
18−20
+0%
4K10
+0%
10−12
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 28
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Elden Ring 34
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Counter-Strike 2 23
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 56
−7.1%
60−65
+7.1%
Metro Exodus 39
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 161
−5.6%
170−180
+5.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Counter-Strike 2 21
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Dota 2 48
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Elden Ring 66
−6.1%
70−75
+6.1%
Far Cry 5 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Fortnite 80−85
−6.3%
85−90
+6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 47
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−6.8%
110−120
+6.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Valorant 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
World of Tanks 180−190
−7.5%
200−210
+7.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 61
−6.6%
65−70
+6.6%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−3.8%
55−60
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−6.8%
110−120
+6.8%
Valorant 146
−2.7%
150−160
+2.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Elden Ring 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−0.8%
120−130
+0.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
World of Tanks 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Elden Ring 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%

This is how Radeon 680M and Arc Pro A30M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 680M is 6% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.17 15.24
Recency 3 January 2023 8 August 2022

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 4 months.

Arc Pro A30M, on the other hand, has a 7.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon 680M and Arc Pro A30M.

Be aware that Radeon 680M is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 983 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.