Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs AMD Radeon 630
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory 4 GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 6000
- Maximum resolution
- Interface
- Core clock speed 350
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance rating | 649 | 802 |
Value for money | 0.50 | no data |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | Gen. 11 (2021) |
GPU code name | Lexa | Gen. 11 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2019 (3 years old) | 11 January 2021 (2 years old) |
Current price | $65 | no data |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 32 |
Core clock speed | no data | 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 900 MHz |
Number of transistors | 2,200 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 4.8 - 10 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 | no data |
Dimensions and compatibility
Information on Radeon 630 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | no data |
HDMI | + | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | no data | + |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Vulkan | + | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | no data | 8 |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
+18.2%
|
10−12
−18.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+500%
|
1
−500%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
+18.2%
|
10−12
−18.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+500%
|
1
−500%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+75%
|
4
−75%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+500%
|
1
−500%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+133%
|
3
−133%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
Hitman 3 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 0−1 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | no data |
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 3.13 | 1.85 |
Recency | 12 August 2019 | 11 January 2021 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 32 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 4 Watt |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
since it shows better performance.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Radeon 630 by NVIDIA
According to our data, the closest equivalent to Radeon 630 by NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 460M, which is slower by 1% and lower by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon 630:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.