Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs AMD Radeon 630

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 65$
Games supported 60%
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory 4 GB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 6000
  • Maximum resolution
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed 350
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now no data
Games supported 57%

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rating649802
Value for money0.50no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameLexaGen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 August 2019 (3 years old)11 January 2021 (2 years old)
Current price$65 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51232
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)50 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate38.98no data

Dimensions and compatibility

Information on Radeon 630 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed6000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX1212_1
OpenGL4.6no data
Vulkan+no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HDno data8

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 no data
Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Hitman 3 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 no data
Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Hitman 3 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4 no data
Metro Exodus 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 no data
Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Hitman 3 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 3.13 1.85
Recency 12 August 2019 11 January 2021
Pipelines / CUDA cores 512 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 50 Watt 4 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

since it shows better performance.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Radeon 630 by NVIDIA

According to our data, the closest equivalent to Radeon 630 by NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 460M, which is slower by 1% and lower by 2 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M GeForce GTX 460M
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon 630:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 26 votes

Rate AMD Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.