Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs 610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking837not rated
Place by popularity65not in top-100
Power efficiency13.36no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameDragon RangeNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)23 July 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1284096
Core clock speed400 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate17.60747.5
Floating-point processing power0.5632 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 23 July 2025
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

Radeon 610M has 1900% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 610M and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 610M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1038 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 8 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 610M or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.