Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.05

AI PRO R9700 outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 1658% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking71517
Place by popularity97not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.11
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRaphaelNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 September 2022 (2 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1284096
Core clock speedno data1660 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data747.5
Floating-point processing powerno data47.84 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−1479%
300−350
+1479%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−1606%
290−300
+1606%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
God of War 10−11
−1600%
170−180
+1600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−1650%
280−290
+1650%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−1606%
290−300
+1606%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1650%
210−220
+1650%
Fortnite 24−27
−1567%
400−450
+1567%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1650%
350−400
+1650%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−1600%
170−180
+1600%
God of War 10−11
−1600%
170−180
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1606%
290−300
+1606%
Valorant 55−60
−1627%
950−1000
+1627%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−1650%
280−290
+1650%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−1606%
290−300
+1606%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−1612%
1250−1300
+1612%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Dota 2 41
−1607%
700−750
+1607%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1650%
210−220
+1650%
Fortnite 24−27
−1567%
400−450
+1567%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1650%
350−400
+1650%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−1600%
170−180
+1600%
God of War 10−11
−1600%
170−180
+1600%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−1592%
220−230
+1592%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1606%
290−300
+1606%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1650%
210−220
+1650%
Valorant 55−60
−1627%
950−1000
+1627%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−1650%
280−290
+1650%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Dota 2 37
−1657%
650−700
+1657%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1650%
210−220
+1650%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1650%
350−400
+1650%
God of War 10−11
−1600%
170−180
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1606%
290−300
+1606%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1650%
210−220
+1650%
Valorant 55−60
−1627%
950−1000
+1627%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−1567%
400−450
+1567%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−1513%
500−550
+1513%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−1567%
550−600
+1567%
Valorant 40−45
−1644%
750−800
+1644%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−1600%
170−180
+1600%
God of War 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1650%
280−290
+1650%
Valorant 20−22
−1650%
350−400
+1650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Dota 2 12−14
−1592%
220−230
+1592%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
God of War 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 1479% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.05 71.19
Recency 26 September 2022 23 July 2025
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm

AI PRO R9700 has a 1657.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 298 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.