Radeon HD 7730M vs 530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 530 and Radeon HD 7730M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 530
2017
4 GB DDR3/GDDR5, 50 Watt
2.63
+33.5%

Radeon 530 outperforms HD 7730M by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking779855
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.530.14
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameMesoLombok GL
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date21 March 2017 (7 years ago)24 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price$627 $338

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Radeon 530 has 279% better value for money than HD 7730M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed1024 MHz575 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate24.5021.60
Floating-point performance784.1 gflops691.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon 530 and Radeon HD 7730M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3/GDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 530 2.63
+33.5%
HD 7730M 1.97

530 outperforms HD 7730M by 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon 530 1017
+33.5%
HD 7730M 762

530 outperforms HD 7730M by 33% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Radeon 530 2327
+57.4%
HD 7730M 1478

530 outperforms HD 7730M by 57% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Radeon 530 6338
HD 7730M 7056
+11.3%

HD 7730M outperforms 530 by 11% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−17.6%
20
+17.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16 no data
Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 10 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20 no data
Hitman 3 5−6 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15 no data
Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 32 no data
Hitman 3 5−6 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 10 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
Hitman 3 8−9 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 no data

This is how Radeon 530 and HD 7730M compete in popular games:

  • HD 7730M is 18% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.63 1.97
Recency 21 March 2017 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

The Radeon 530 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7730M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 530
Radeon 530
AMD Radeon HD 7730M
Radeon HD 7730M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 674 votes

Rate Radeon 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 28 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.