GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs RTX A5500

Place in performance ranking	38	6
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.67	30.32
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	GA102	AD103-275
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	22 March 2022 (2 years ago)	24 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799
Current price	$3965	$820 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 1036% better value for money than RTX A5500.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	10240	8448
Core clock speed	no data	2340 MHz
Boost clock speed	1665 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	532.8	689.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	310 mm
Width	2-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	16 GB/s	21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	768.0 GB/s	716.8 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A5500 55.66

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.07
+47.4%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms RTX A5500 by 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX A5500 21494

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31696
+47.5%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms RTX A5500 by 47% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	140−150 −54.3%	216 +54.3%
1440p	100−110 −50%	150 +50%
4K	60−65 −53.3%	92 +53.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −54.1%	130−140 +54.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −52.5%	240−250 +52.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −50%	120−130 +50%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −47.5%	110−120 +47.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −54.6%	200−210 +54.6%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −47.6%	250−260 +47.6%
Hitman 3	80−85 −53.8%	120−130 +53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 −50.9%	300−350 +50.9%
Metro Exodus	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −55%	120−130 +55%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 −55.7%	467 +55.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −55.5%	171 +55.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −54.1%	130−140 +54.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −52.5%	240−250 +52.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −50%	120−130 +50%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −47.5%	110−120 +47.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −54.6%	200−210 +54.6%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −47.6%	250−260 +47.6%
Hitman 3	80−85 −53.8%	120−130 +53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 −50.9%	300−350 +50.9%
Metro Exodus	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −55%	120−130 +55%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	290−300 −52.4%	442 +52.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	290−300 −48.3%	430 +48.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −52.6%	140−150 +52.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −54.1%	130−140 +54.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −50%	120−130 +50%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −47.5%	110−120 +47.5%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −47.6%	250−260 +47.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 −50.9%	300−350 +50.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	270−280 −50.7%	407 +50.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 −50%	210 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −51.6%	144 +51.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
−55%

120−130

+55%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −50.9%	160−170 +50.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −51.6%	140−150 +51.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 −52.3%	95−100 +52.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 −54.3%	100−110 +54.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −49.3%	110−120 +49.3%
Far Cry 5	120−130 −55.8%	187 +55.8%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −51.4%	210−220 +51.4%
Hitman 3	80−85 −50%	120−130 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −48.7%	220−230 +48.7%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −50.6%	120−130 +50.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200−210 −53%	306 +53%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 −59%	159 +59%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −54.7%	116 +54.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90
−48.2%

120−130

+48.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −60%	85−90 +60%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −53.3%	65−70 +53.3%
Hitman 3	50−55 −52%	75−80 +52%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −51.1%	130−140 +51.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −57.1%	110 +57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 −54.1%	130−140 +54.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −60%	70−75 +60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 −53.3%	65−70 +53.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −48.6%	50−55 +48.6%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −66.7%	50−55 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −50%	160−170 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −51.1%	130−140 +51.1%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −55.4%	100−110 +55.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −53.3%	69 +53.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70

−52.3%

95−100
+52.3%

This is how RTX A5500 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 54% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 50% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 53% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	55.66	82.07
Recency	22 March 2022	24 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	285 Watt