GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs RTX A5000

Place in performance ranking	30	6
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.79	30.36
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	GA102	AD103-275
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	24 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799
Current price	$3327	$820 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 701% better value for money than RTX A5000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8192	8448
Core clock speed	no data	2340 MHz
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	433.9	689.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	310 mm
Width	2-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	16 GB/s	21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	768.0 GB/s	716.8 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A5000 59.01

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.07
+39.1%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms RTX A5000 by 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX A5000 22791

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31696
+39.1%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms RTX A5000 by 39% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	150−160 −44%	216 +44%
1440p	100−110 −50%	150 +50%
4K	65−70 −41.5%	92 +41.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 −45.6%	130−140 +45.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Battlefield 5	170−180 −43.5%	240−250 +43.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 −41.2%	120−130 +41.2%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −47.5%	110−120 +47.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 −43.6%	200−210 +43.6%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −39.4%	250−260 +39.4%
Hitman 3	85−90 −44.7%	120−130 +44.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240−250 −44.6%	300−350 +44.6%
Metro Exodus	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 −45.9%	120−130 +45.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 −55.7%	467 +55.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −42.5%	171 +42.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 −45.6%	130−140 +45.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Battlefield 5	170−180 −43.5%	240−250 +43.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 −41.2%	120−130 +41.2%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −47.5%	110−120 +47.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 −43.6%	200−210 +43.6%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −39.4%	250−260 +39.4%
Hitman 3	85−90 −44.7%	120−130 +44.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240−250 −44.6%	300−350 +44.6%
Metro Exodus	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 −45.9%	120−130 +45.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 −47.3%	442 +47.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	300−310 −43.3%	430 +43.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 −45%	140−150 +45%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 −45.6%	130−140 +45.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 −41.2%	120−130 +41.2%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −47.5%	110−120 +47.5%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −39.4%	250−260 +39.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240−250 −44.6%	300−350 +44.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	290−300 −40.3%	407 +40.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 −40%	210 +40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 −44%	144 +44%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90
−45.9%

120−130

+45.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −50.9%	160−170 +50.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 −44%	140−150 +44%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 −41.4%	95−100 +41.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 −44%	100−110 +44%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −40%	110−120 +40%
Far Cry 5	130−140 −43.8%	187 +43.8%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 −41.3%	210−220 +41.3%
Hitman 3	85−90 −42.4%	120−130 +42.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 −39.4%	220−230 +39.4%
Metro Exodus	90−95 −42.2%	120−130 +42.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 −39.1%	306 +39.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −44.5%	159 +44.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −45%	116 +45%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95
−40%

120−130

+40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −46.7%	85−90 +46.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −53.3%	65−70 +53.3%
Hitman 3	50−55 −52%	75−80 +52%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −43.2%	130−140 +43.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 −46.7%	110 +46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 −45.6%	130−140 +45.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −44%	70−75 +44%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 −53.3%	65−70 +53.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −48.6%	50−55 +48.6%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −50%	160−170 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −43.2%	130−140 +43.2%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −44.3%	100−110 +44.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −53.3%	69 +53.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

70−75

−41.4%

95−100
+41.4%

This is how RTX A5000 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 44% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 50% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 42% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	59.01	82.07
Recency	12 April 2021	24 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	285 Watt