RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs RTX A500 Embedded

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A500 Embedded with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX A500 Embedded
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 20 Watt
5.09

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX A500 Embedded by a whopping 812% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking62873
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data83.51
Power efficiency17.4445.42
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA107SAD107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482816
Core clock speed435 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1335 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate85.44187.4
Floating-point processing power5.468 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs6488
Tensor Cores6488
Ray Tracing Cores1622

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A500 Embedded 5.09
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 46.40
+812%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A500 Embedded 1959
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17876
+813%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.09 46.40
Recency 30 March 2022 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 70 Watt

RTX A500 Embedded has 250% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 811.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A500 Embedded in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A500 Embedded is a mobile workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
RTX A500 Embedded
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A500 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 27 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.