RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile vs RTX A4500
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX A4500 with RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX A4500 outperforms RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 69 | 101 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 19.29 | 34.09 |
Architecture | Ampere (2020−2025) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) |
GPU code name | GA102 | GB203 |
Market segment | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 November 2021 (3 years ago) | 19 March 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7168 | 10496 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 990 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Number of transistors | 28,300 million | 45,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 95 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 369.6 | 496.9 |
Floating-point processing power | 23.65 TFLOPS | 31.8 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 96 | 112 |
TMUs | 224 | 328 |
Tensor Cores | 224 | 328 |
Ray Tracing Cores | 56 | 82 |
L1 Cache | 7 MB | 10.3 MB |
L2 Cache | 6 MB | 64 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 640.0 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.8 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4 |
CUDA | 8.6 | 12.0 |
DLSS | + | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 130−140
+13%
| 115
−13%
|
1440p | 95−100
+17.3%
| 81
−17.3%
|
4K | 55−60
+17%
| 47
−17%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
Counter-Strike 2 | 230−240
+0%
|
230−240
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
Battlefield 5 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 230−240
+0%
|
230−240
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Fortnite | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
Valorant | 240−250
+0%
|
240−250
+0%
|
Full HD
High
Battlefield 5 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 230−240
+0%
|
230−240
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Fortnite | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
Valorant | 240−250
+0%
|
240−250
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
Fortnite | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
1440p
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 300−310
+0%
|
300−310
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Valorant | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
Fortnite | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
4K
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Valorant | 250−260
+0%
|
250−260
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
4K
Epic
Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
This is how RTX A4500 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX A4500 is 13% faster in 1080p
- RTX A4500 is 17% faster in 1440p
- RTX A4500 is 17% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 47.74 | 40.07 |
Recency | 23 November 2021 | 19 March 2025 |
Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | 24 GB |
Chip lithography | 8 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 95 Watt |
RTX A4500 has a 19.1% higher aggregate performance score.
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 20% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 110.5% lower power consumption.
The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that RTX A4500 is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.