RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile vs A10G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared A10G with RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

A10G
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
32.50

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms A10G by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking182107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.6433.20
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGA102GB203
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2021 (4 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores921610496
Core clock speed1320 MHz990 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate492.5551.0
Floating-point processing power31.52 TFLOPS35.27 TFLOPS
ROPs96112
TMUs288328
Tensor Cores288328
Ray Tracing Cores7282
L1 Cache9 MB10.3 MB
L2 Cache6 MB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount12 GB24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1563 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth600.2 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA8.612.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
−31.5%
171
+31.5%
1440p90−95
−33.3%
120
+33.3%
4K65−70
−33.8%
87
+33.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160
+0%
160
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 138
+0%
138
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170
+0%
170
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how A10G and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 32% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 33% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 34% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.50 41.07
Recency 12 April 2021 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 95 Watt

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile has a 26.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 57.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the A10G in performance tests.

Be aware that A10G is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A10G
A10G
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 49 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A10G or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.