RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs RTX A4500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A10 PCIe A10G A10M A40 PCIe CMP 90HX Quadro RTX 8200 Quadro RTX A6000 A40 A4500 A5000 A5000-8Q A5500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Embedded 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Embedded 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4500 with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4500
2021
20 GB GDDR6, 200 Watt
49.87
+39.7%

RTX A4500 outperforms RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking67150
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.4161.77
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGA102GB206
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date23 November 2021 (4 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores71683328
Core clock speed1050 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1657 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate369.6172.3
Floating-point processing power23.65 TFLOPS11.03 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs224104
Tensor Cores224104
Ray Tracing Cores5626
L1 Cache7 MB3.3 MB
L2 Cache6 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount20 GB8 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth640.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.612.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD180−190
+39.5%
129
−39.5%
1440p95−100
+35.7%
70
−35.7%
4K110−120
+35.8%
81
−35.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 146
+0%
146
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+0%
93
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how RTX A4500 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 is 40% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 is 36% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4500 is 36% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 49.87 35.71
Recency 23 November 2021 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 45 Watt

RTX A4500 has a 39.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 344.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4500 is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX A4500 RTX A4500
vs
RTX A5500 RTX A5500
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
vs
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB
vs
RX 7900 XT Radeon RX 7900 XT
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
vs
RX 7900 XT RX 7900 XT
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
vs
UHD Graphics 770 Graphics 770
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
vs
Pro V620 Pro V620
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
UHD Graphics 770 Mobile UHD Graphics 770 Mobile
vs
RX 6400 RX 6400
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT
vs
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
PRO W7900 Radeon PRO W7900
vs
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX 4080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q
vs
Instinct MI210 Instinct MI210
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
vs
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 212 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A4500 or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.